Thread:NewGenTV/@comment-24527343-20160801013501/@comment-24527343-20160801074205

You were. I was one of those users. I and the other user (I forgot who) were reverting your edits because you were removing important information. It unfortunately turned into an edit war. In that case, and I'm not trying to be a bitch here, but you kinda broke policy by doing such, because it states that whenever there is an edit war, either a reasonable conclusion is drawn or the article stays as such before the first edit was made that started the edit war. In one of my edits summaries, I stated that the information regarding Mark's view and sub counts should and would remain until your new template that can update those numbers automatically can be added, in which case, the sentences would easily be replaced by the template. But instead of responding to my solution, you undid the edit and simply "protected" it literally forever.

There are also further problems with your indefinite "protection" of the article. The page has plenty of errors in grammar and spelling. Sections can be expanded, and some coding fixes are needed as well. I request that you un-protect it so that registered users can edit it to improve the article overall.

No hard feelings toward you, but I feel this to be an abuse of your power as admin (as I take "Lead Editor" and "Honorary Member" to mean). Please leave the article as it was before the edit that sparked the edit war (when you first removed the information). This matter can be further discussed on Markiplier's article's talk page.